Chiefs Defend Slow Network for the iPhone

SAN FRANCISCO, June 28 — On the eve of the Apple iPhone’s sale, the top executives of Apple and AT&T defended their decision to rely upon AT&T’s slow Edge wireless data network, rather than a faster network that is less widely available.

Early reviews of the iPhone, while positive, have faulted the slower network because it will limit the palm-size wireless computer’s greatest strength — making the Internet easily accessible on the go.

“It doesn’t concern me,” said Randall L. Stephenson, the new AT&T chief executive, in a joint telephone interview on Thursday along with Steven P. Jobs, Apple’s chief executive. The fact that the iPhone offers faster Wi-Fi networking would more than make up for the relatively slow 300-kilobit-a-second pace of its cellular data network, he suggested.

The phone goes on sale Friday at 6 p.m. at Apple and AT&T stores.

Both executives said they were not certain what to expect at the stores on Friday evening. Lines have begun to form in some parts of the country, but there is uncertainty whether a $500-to-$600 consumer product can attract millions, rather than tens of thousands, of early customers.

“We’ve certainly built a lot of iPhones, although it may not be enough,” Mr. Jobs said. Changing a forecast in the consumer electronics industry is difficult, he said, because of the long lead times necessary to build components like semiconductors.

And Mr. Stephenson said, “I think it’s going to be an exciting evening.” He said his company had added about 2,000 employees in an effort to handle what it expects will be large crowds.

Mr. Jobs said Apple planned to limit sales to two for each customer, and Mr. Stephenson said AT&T would restrict purchases to a single phone.

Concern surrounding the AT&T network could be one of the biggest unknowns as the product rolls out. That did not diminish Mr. Stephenson’s enthusiasm.

“I got to tell you, carrying this thing around and experiencing those kinds of speeds on a wireless handset, your imagination begins to run in terms of what’s possible,” he said, “and by the way, there’s not a 3G network available in Ottumwa, Iowa,” referring to the so-called third generation of Web-enabled cellphones that require faster networks. “If you want to sell these devices in a variety of places, Edge is the only opportunity you have.”

AT&T has invested $16 billion in its network over the last two years, and the network is now designed to handle the expected increase in wireless data users, he said, adding: “Capacity won’t be an issue. The network is ready.”

Mr. Jobs said the decision to hold off on using AT&T’s faster HSDPA network — shorthand for High-Speed Downlink Packet Access — was a trade-off.

“Edge is good, but you’d like it to be faster,” he said, suggesting that the availability of local Wi-Fi networks would make up for the Edge network’s slower speed.

Mr. Jobs also said Apple’s hardware design team had decided against using the more advanced 3G chip sets because they were relatively power-hungry. As a result, Apple improved the battery life of the iPhone.

“We felt it wasn’t the right trade-off now,” he said. “I’m sure that will all change in the future.”

The iPhone could have an effect on the cellphone industry akin to the influence the Macintosh computer from Apple had on the personal computer industry in 1984, Mr. Jobs said.

He said he thought that the iPhone’s “multitouch” control system, in which the fingers are used to scroll through data or enlarge photos on the screen, was the biggest shift in a computer’s user interface since the Macintosh was introduced.

“It’s the first thing to come along since the mouse and the bit-mapped display and take things to the next level,” he said.

Mr. Jobs seized on the multitouch technology after Apple product designers proposed it as a “safari pad,” a portable Web surfing appliance. Instead, he saw the technology as something that could be used for a similar purpose in a cellphone, a former Apple employee said.

The two executives said they were comfortable with the unexplored implications of the business relationship they have forged. In a break with the tradition of the cellphone industry, Apple is taking responsibility for the activation of the iPhone as well as account maintenance through its iTunes software on a customer’s Mac or PC. Account control has been jealously guarded by the cellphone carriers.

Mr. Stephenson remarked: “That’s what the customers want, and you can give them a good experience. Why would we not do that? I like this model a lot.”

And Mr. Jobs said, “We’re doing the front end, and AT&T is doing the back end on the same computers they would normally use to manage their network.”

The new system, he said, would permit store personnel to help people more rapidly by letting customers handle the setup themselves at home.

Mr. Jobs hinted that there would be announcements about services for corporate users within several weeks. “There’s already corporations who have been running pilots hooking up to exchange servers and other kinds of mail servers, and they have gone very well,” he said.

Neither man was willing to describe where the partnership between the companies might lead if it turned out to be a success. AT&T has joined with Microsoft as part of its effort to enter into direct competition with cable companies.

Mr. Stephenson acknowledged that he was intrigued by Apple’s TV system.

Recently, Mr. Jobs referred to the system, which is intended to transfer Internet video to television sets and computers, as a “hobby,” suggesting that Apple was still refining its strategy in the market.

Mr. Stephenson, however, said, “AT&T is interested in anything that drives more bandwidth requirements, and Apple TV drives significant bandwidth, and the iPhone drives significant bandwidth, and so I think it’s a very logical fit.”